
Suicide Bombings and "Relative Calm"
December 27,
2003
Today's Contents: Four Killed, Twenty Hurt in Geha Bombing (Ha'aretz) First
suicide bombing in Israel in nearly three months
117 Palestinians killed, Hundreds Injured During
Media's Period of "Realtive Calm" (Ali Abunimah, Electronic Intifada) What
relative calm means for Palestinians Hundreds Protest IDF's Use of Shots to
Disperse Demonstrators (Ha'aretz) Latest IDF response to peaceful
protests
[Four people were killed and 20 wounded Thursday
in the first attack on Israeli civilians since October 4. The attack was claimed
by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. It is expected that the
Israeli response, which has thus far been limited to a closure of the
OccupiedTerritories(which is, in itself, still a form of collective punishment),
will be directed at Syria.
It is likely no coincidence that Ariel Sharon
picked the day after this attack to discuss, for the first time, the Syrian
offer of a resumption of peace talks. The PFLP leadership is believed to be
headquartered in Damascus. It is
likely that Israel will attempt to use this incident, as well as the October 4
bombing (carried out by Islamic Jihad, which is not headquartered in Syria, but
does have some operatives and offices there) to pressure Syria to act against
these groups as a prelude to any talks.
Media reports have described this as an end to a
period of “relative calm” in the region. See our second
article in this e-mail to see a description of what “relative calm” is to
Palestinians. – MP]
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/376178.html
Four killed, 20
hurt in Geha bombing
Four people were killed and 20 wounded in a suicide
bombing at the Geha Junction between Petah Tikva and Bnei Brak
yesterday.
The names of the dead had not been released for publication as of
press time last night. Of the injured, one was in serious condition and four
were in moderate condition. The others were lightly injured, with many members
of this group suffering only from shock. The injured were evacuated to
BeilinsonHospital
in Petah
Tikva,
Sheba
Medical Center in Tel Hashomer and SharonMedicalCenter
in Petah Tikva.
The attack was the first successful suicide bombing
since the one at Maxim's restaurant in Haifa
on October 4, which killed 21 people. There have been 22 other attempted suicide
bombings in the interim, according to the IDF Spokesman, but all were foiled by
the security services.
The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
claimed responsibility for the attack, saying it was to avenge the Israel
Defense Forces' killing of Fadi Hanani, a senior member of that organization, in
a gun fight in Nablus
about 10 days ago. The organization identified the bomber as Said Hanani, 21, of
nearby Beit Furik, a relative of Fadi's and another member of the PFLP's
Nablus
cell.
Following the bombing, Israel
imposed a full closure on the territories. In addition, IDF Chief of Staff Moshe
Ya'alon convened senior army officials for a situation assessment, and is
expected to meet today with Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz for further
discussions.
However, since Israel
is apparently not interested in taking harsh measures against the Palestinians
just now, its response is likely to be confined to the closure and a stepped-up
hunt for wanted terrorists - a hunt that would have taken place in any case, as
the Shin Bet security service currently has 52 warnings of planned terrorist
attacks.
In contrast, Israeli officials are expected to play
up the fact that the PFLP's leadership is headquartered in
Damascus,
as a way of increasing pressure on
Syria
to rein in the terrorist organizations that it harbors. The defense
establishment believes that the PFLP's Damascus
leadership is involved in attacks such as yesterday's, though to a lesser degree
than officials in the territories.
Most of the PFLP cells' orders, defense officials
say, still come from a group of PFLP leaders who have been in a Palestinian jail
in Jericho,
under British and American supervision, for more than a year. The Palestinian
Authority jailed these men due to Israeli and American pressure following the
PFLP's assassination of minister Rehavam Ze'evi in October 2001, but they have
been given virtually unrestricted telephone access, issue frequent press
statements and receive regular visits from other PFLP
members.
The PFLP has also been known to receive money from
organizations in Lebanon,
and it frequently cooperates with local Fatah cells.
Beit Furik, Said's hometown, is a known PFLP
stronghold, and the Hanani clan, which is the largest in Beit Furik, is known to
have several other members involved in terrorist activity, including two who
committed an attack on the settlement of Elon Moreh in
April.
The suicide bombing took place during the
busy evening rush hour at a bus stop at the Geha Junction, where Palestinian
workers routinely wait for people to pick them up for potential jobs, police
said. The bomber, carrying a medium-sized bomb, approached the bus stop at about
6:30
P.M.
and blew himself up, killing two people immediately and mortally wounding a
third, who died en route to the hospital. A fourth person, who was seriously
injured, died in the hospital a few hours later.
The explosion reduced the bus stop to a skeletal
frame and brought rush hour traffic on one of Israel's
busiest roads to a stop. Rescue workers said they had difficulty reaching the
scene because of the heavy traffic at Geha, a major junction just outside Tel
Aviv.
Immediately after the bombing, police began searching
the area for accomplices, as several eyewitnesses said that they saw two men who
looked Arab fleeing the scene. As of last night, however, no one had been
arrested, and police said they had no idea how the bomber reached the junction
or who helped him.
Police said that though they
had received warnings yesterday afternoon that terrorists might try to
infiltrate the Sharon
region to carry out an attack, and had raised the alert level in response, the
warnings were not specific enough to enable them to set up roadblocks in an
effort to find the terrorist.
Batsheva Boshri of Ra'anana, whose soldier daughter
Shiran was moderately to seriously wounded, encapsulated the anguish that family
and friends experience after an attack. "[Shiran] called me at home and said
`Mother, there was an attack, I'm wounded,' but then the call was cut off," she
said. "Later I reached her and she said she was in Tel Hashomer. She told me she
had seen her friend fall, and asked me to find her. But so far, I haven't found
her."
[The most recent Palestinian suicide bombing on December 25th,
killing Israeli 4 non-combatants in Tel Aviv was the first since October 4th,
when Palestinians killed 21 non-combatants, including 4 children. These actions
were awful and indefensible crimes, possibly rising to the level of crimes
against humanity, and were rightly treated as such by the major national and
international Western news media.
The second
attack however was also described, as Ali Abunimah of the Electronic Intifada
points out in this article, as marking the end of a 'relative lull' in violence
in the area. As Abunimah shows, collating evidence from the weekly reports of
the Palestinian Centre for Human Right, this is an oft-repeated falsehood that
significantly impairs the ability of people of conscience to understand and
respond to their governments' actions in the region.
The facts are as follows. According the IDF, between October 4th and
December 25th a total of 12 Israelis died and 3 were wounded in Palestinian
attacks, all of which targeted military or paramilitary personnel acting to
enforce the illegal occupation of the West Bank
or Gaza Strip. It is worth noting that the General Assembly of the United
Nations has repeatedly asserted the right of people to use violence (in
conformity with the laws of war) to resist military occupation by a foreign
power. (Two additional Palestinian attacks, other than the suicide bombings,
also contravened the laws of war: in one of them 3 American diplomats were
killed, and in the other, carried out by a lone Jordanian, an Ecuadorian tourist
was killed.)
By contrast however between October 2nd and
December 25th no fewer than 117 Palestinians, including 23 children, were killed
and many hundreds injured by Israeli death squads. In addition, Israeli forces
destroyed 486 Palestinian homes, in some cases as collective punishments
pursuing an explicit policy that is in breach of the Geneva conventions,
continued to expand illegal Jewish-only settlement programs, maintained a system
of effective apartheid for road and land use, and refused to dismantle the
network of military checkpoints that violate the rights of Palestinians to move
and assemble freely. Palestinians took no comparable additional measures against
Israel. Those concerned will draw their own conclusions about what the
phrase 'relative calm' means. AWJW]
117 Palestinians killed, hundreds injured
during media's periof of "relative calm"
By Ali Abunimah
The
Electronic Intifada 26 December 2003
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article2301.shtml
On
December 25, an Israeli assassination squad killed five Palestinians in
Gaza,
and injured fifteen. Three of the dead were civilians. A short time later, a
Palestinian blew himself up at a bus stop in the Tel Aviv suburb of Petah Tikva,
killing four Israeli civilians.
Many leading media organizations were
quick to declare that these two incidents marked the end of a period of
"relative calm" or "lull" in Israeli-Palestinian violence, that had supposedly
lasted since the last Palestinian suicide attack in
Haifa
on 4 October.
In fact, the period since 4 October has been one of intense
Israeli violence, in which 117 Palestinians were killed, including 23 children.
At the same time, Israel
destroyed almost five hundred Palestinian homes throughout the
OccupiedTerritories.
Mass
amnesia again strikes Middle East correspondents
A front-page Los Angeles
Times headline declared "12-Week lull in Mideast Ends," and misreported that the
"back to back spasms of violence" on 25 December, "shattered more than two
months of relative quiet and dealt a fresh setback to peace efforts" (26
December 2003).
"Mideast
quiet shattered: Suicide bombing kills four Israelis shortly after assassination
in Gaza,"
declared The Montreal Gazette on Page 1 (26 December
2003).
The
Chicago Tribune reported that "Coming less than an hour apart," the 25 December
"attacks broke a lull that had lasted more than two months and raised fears of a
slide into violence" (26 December 2003).
CNN reported on its website that
the Petah Tikva attack "was the first suicide bombing in
Israel
since an October 4 attack in Haifa.
That incident killed 21 people. There has been a relative calm since the
Haifa
bombing" ("Suicide bomber kills three in Tel Aviv, " 25
December 2003).
Even
the usually careful U.K.-based Reuters news agency's report (which had an
identical headline to the CNN report) stated that, "the attacks on Thursday
shattered well over two months of relative calm that had spurred efforts to
revive talks between Israelis and Palestinians on a U.S.-led plan for ending
more than three years of conflict" ("Suicide bomber kills three in Tel Aviv,"
25 December 2003).
In an extraordinary act of forgetfulness, a New York
Times report by Richard Bernstein and Greg Myre declared that "The suicide bomb
attack in Petah Tikva broke a tense sort of relative calm that has existed on
both sides since October" (26 December 2003). But just a few paragraphs above
this sentence, the same article reported that "Less than an hour *before* the
suicide attack, Israeli gunships fired missiles at a car in Gaza, killing a
commander of Islamic Jihad, who Israeli officials said was planning a 'mega'
attack inside Israel" (emphasis added). The report also stated that four others
were killed including "two bystanders" and 14 people were injured.
Not
only did the Times forget what had happened just an hour before the Petah Tikva
bomb, it had apparently wiped from memory a report by the same Greg Myre on 24
December, headlined "Israelis Kill 8 Palestinians in Raid on a Camp in
Gaza."
According to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR), a total of nine
Palestinians were killed in the Israeli attack on Rafah refugee camp about which
Myre reported. Among the 37 injured, eight were children, and 116 families were
made homeless.
What really happened during the period of "relative
calm"
Contrary to the pervasive media claim that the period between 4
October and 25 December was one of "relative calm," "quiet" or "lull," it was
actually one of intense Israeli violence on Palestinians throughout the
OccupiedTerritories.
Using
the meticulous weekly reports of the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR),
EI counted that Israeli forces killed 117 Palestinians from 2 October to 25
December. The vast majority of the dead were civilians and 23 of them were
children. Hundreds of civilians were injured by Israeli fire.
During the
same period, PCHR documented that Israeli occupation forces destroyed 486 houses
and apartments, rendering thousands of Palestinians homeless.
During the
same period, few Israeli soldiers and civilians were killed in Palestinian
attacks, and there were indeed no suicide attacks since 4 October.
Israel
claims that the huge drop in violence against its civilians was largely because
it "foiled" such attacks. But, the New York Times reported on 5 December that,
"Israeli officials have concluded that the Islamic movement Hamas has suspended
its suicide bombing campaign in recent months, a senior Israeli military officer
said Thursday, citing that as one reason Israel has not suffered any deadly
bombings in the past two months."
What is indisputable is that
Israel
was killing and injuring Palestinians by the hundreds. Here are a few examples
of incidents that occurred during the media's period of "relative
calm":
*On 10 October, a large contingent of Israeli forces, armed with
over 80 tanks, armored bulldozers and helicopters, entered Rafah refugee camp in
southern Gaza. During the two-day long attack, 8 Palestinians were killed,
including 3 children, and 53 were wounded; 20 seriously. Israeli forces
destroyed 170 homes rendering more than 2000 Palestinians homeless.
In
response to this incident, Amnesty International issued a statement saying "The
repeated practice by the Israeli army of deliberate and wanton destruction of
homes and civilian property is a grave violation of international human rights
and humanitarian law, notably articles 22 and 53 of the Fourth Geneva
Convention, and constitutes a war crime."
*On 20 October, Israeli
occupation forces carried out two assassination attacks that killed eleven
Palestinians. Eight of the dead were bystanders. The first attack occurred in
the morning, when Israeli helicopters fired a missile at a car stopped at a
traffic light in GazaCity.
The missile killed the two occupants of the targeted car, and the driver of
an adjacent car. Nine passing civilians sustained injuries, one of them serious.
That evening, seven Palestinians were killed, including a child and an on-duty
doctor when Israeli forces carried out a failed assassination attempt in
Gaza's
Nusseirat refugee camp. The targets of the attack escaped, but in addition to
the seven civilians killed, 50 were injured, including 11 children. An eighth
civilian later died from his injuries.
*On 26 October, Israeli occupation
forces in Gaza
killed three members of the same family who were on their way to visit relatives
to celebrate Eid al-Fitr, the end of the fasting month of Ramadan. The three
men, Khaled Ahmed Ibrahim al-Sumairi, 40, Ussama Suleiman 'Aayesh Al-Sumairi,
30, Ibrahim Mousa al-Sumairi, 32, got into their car at approximately 8.45 PM at
their home in Wadi Salqa village in the central Gaza Strip. When they were
approximately 300 metres from their house, Israeli forces opened fire on them
without warning, injuring all three. The occupation forces then imposed a
military curfew on the area, preventing Palestinian ambulances from reaching the
men for more than 90 minutes. By the time ambulances were allowed to tend to the
victims, two had died. The third died of his injuries upon arrival at Deir
al-Balah hospital. After initially claiming that the three men had been armed,
the Israeli media reported that the occupation authorities admitted that the men
were in fact unarmed and had been killed "by mistake."
*On 8 December at
approximately 3
PM,
Israeli forces stationed at "Neve Dekalim" settlement, west of Khan Yunis, in
Gaza
opened fire at the al-Namsawi area of Khan Yunis refugee camp. A Palestinian
schoolchild, Fatima Mousa Khalafallah, age 10, was wounded by a live bullet in
the chest while she was in her school approximately 700 metres away from the
source of fire.
These are just four examples of the dozens of violent
incidents that took 117 Palestinian lives, and injured hundreds more since early
October.
Despite the continuous bloodshed, mainstream media organizations
have habitually described this period as being one of "relative calm" or "quiet"
that ended only when several Israeli civilians were killed.
This
widespread pattern is the most persistent and pernicious failure of the media in
reporting the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It represents not only a shocking
lack of professionalism and objectivity, but a double standard that treats the
lives of one set of human beings as being inherently more valuable than those of
another.
[The IDF has once again fired on peaceful
protesters, and this time it is drawing some attention. Since the beginning of
the second intifada, such violent reactions to protests have been all too common
among Israeli soldiers and police, beginning with the killing of 13 Arab
citizens of
Israel in the
early days of the intifada, and continuing through the deaths of international
activists, most notably Rachel Corrie. The protest was against the separation wall, and
included “violent shaking” of the wall, at a spot where it was made of
fence-like material rather than the very tall concrete much of the completed
portion consists of. Protesters also tried to use wire cutters to cut through
it. At no time is there any mention of anything remotely resembling a threat to
the soldiers.
It is interesting to observe the reactions
reported here by Ha’aretz. We see, for example, the result of the Israeli
campaign to label the International Solidarity Movement a “terrorist” group.
Likud MK Uzi Landau says the IDF were acting against "collaborators with terror, and therefore were protecting the citizens
of Israel." A chilling reminder indeed of how the propaganda around
terrorism, treating it as a political tool rather than the threat to innocents
that it is, works to sustain the Likud’s political power. This is not unlike its
similar uses by the Bush administration.
MK Yossi Sarid (Meretz) points out that "no shots have ever been fired at settlers despite the fact that they
have endangered the lives of soldiers on numerous occasions." Sarid refers to
numerous occasions where settlers have attacked soldiers quite directly. No
doubt, there is a difference in the orders soldiers are receiving in these
different incidents. That kind of double standard is worth our most serious
attention. – MP]
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/376391.html
Hundreds
protest IDF use of shots to disperse demonstrators
By Amos Harel,
Haaretz Correspondent and Haaretz Service
Some 300
demonstrators gathered late Saturday opposite the Defense Ministry building in
Tel Aviv, to protest the Israel Defense Forces' use of live ammunition to
disperse a demonstration against the separation fence near the West Bank village
of Meskhah. An Israeli demonstrator was seriously injured and an American was
lightly wounded Friday when IDF troops opened fire on
protestors.
Several demonstrators were detained by
police after they sat on the road and blocked traffic.
The Head of the Knesset Foreign Affairs
and Defense Committee, MK Yuval Steinitz (Likud), said Saturday morning that he
intends to convene a committee meeting to discuss an incident Friday in which
Israel Defense Force soldiers shot and wounded two people during a
demonstration against the West
Bank separation fence, Israel Radio
reported. Gil Na'amati, an Israeli citizen from
Kibbutz Re'im in the Negev sustained serious wounds,
while an American tourist was lightly hurt.
Na'amati is currently in stable condition
at BeilinsonHospital in Petah
Tikva, while the American woman has been released from
hospital. Meretz MK Yossi Sarid said on Saturday
that orders like the ones issued to soldiers who shot at the demonstrators will
only encourage refusal to serve in the territories among Israeli
reservists. "Left wingers and Palestinians are
easy pray [sic] for [Defense Minister] Mofaz and [Chief of Staff] Ya’alon,"
Sarid said, and added that "no shots have ever been fired at settlers despite
the fact that they have endangered the lives of soldiers on numerous
occasions." Uzi Landau, Likud Minister without
portfolio said Saturday that the troops acted against "collaborators with
terror, and therefore were protecting the citizens of
Israel." Labor MK Matan Vilani responded to
Landau, saying he was paving the way for a political
assassination. The incident occurred close to the
Palestinian village of
Meskha, east of
Rosh Ha'ayin, where around 100 members of the Anarchist Movement against the
Wall and the International Solidarity Movement were protesting against the
construction of the security fence. Major General
Moshe Kaplinsky, head of the GOC Central Command, on Friday appointed a colonel
to investigate the shooting incident. MK Zehava Gal-On (Meretz) called Saturday
for the probe to be taken out of the hands of the military. Deputy Defense Ministry Ze'ev Boim (Likud) said Saturday that he hopes
that an investigation will make clear that the IDF soldiers involved in the
shooting were following military regulations. He added that when he recovers
from the wounds sustained in the shooting incident, Na'amati would be tried for
sabotaging the fence. Video footage of the
incident broadcast on Channel Two television showed Israeli demonstrators on the
Palestinian side of the fence violently shaking it, with some trying to cut the
fence with wire cutters. During the protest,
troops used live ammunition. At a later stage, another foreign activist was
wounded by a rubber bullet. Na'amati, whose friends said was hit by two bullets,
was evacuated to Beilinson hospital in Petah Tikva. The soldiers claimed that Na'amati was wearing a mask when he was
shot. The troops involved in the incident were
from a Golani company stationed in the area. According to military sources, one
live shot was fired in the direction of the demonstrators, who were attempting
to cut through the separation fence with wire cutters. One demonstrator was hit
in the leg by the shot, the sources said. "The shot was fired in accordance with
regulations," the sources insisted.
One of the
demonstrators, Jonathan Faulk, told Haaretz that a group of soldiers opened fire
in his direction, from a distance of several meters. Faulk said that there was
no warning before the shots were fired, and that "the soldiers' lives were never
in any danger." MK Eitan Cabel (Labor) told Israel
Radio that the IDF Spokesman must provide a clear explanation as to why IDF
troops opened fire on Israeli protestors. Meretz
MK Avshalom Vilan said that it must be determined who gave the order to open
fire. Likud MK Ehud Yatom condemned the incident,
and said that there were other means for dealing with protesters who do not
endanger the lives of soldiers.
Jewish Peace News Editors: Judith Norman Alistair Welchman Mitchell
Plitnick Lincoln Shlensky Ami Kronfeld Rela Mazali Sarah Anne Minkin
Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.
Tell-a-friend!
© Copyright by JewishVoiceForPeace.org
|
|