By Emad Mekay, Al-Ahram Weekly
June 22, 2006
Caterpillar, which supplies the Israeli army, faces questions of conscience as Zionist groups rush to its aid.
The parents of a US peace activist who was crushed to death by an
Israeli bulldozer built by the global machinery giant Caterpillar
confronted the company last week for the first time, urging
shareholders at its annual meeting to end sales of "weaponised
bulldozers to Israel".
Cindy and Craig Corrie, parents of the late Rachel Corrie, attended
the meeting as proxy voters on behalf of Jewish and Christian
institutional investors who have filed a resolution asking for greater
corporate accountability from Caterpillar.
"Why would we pay for our own homes with the destruction of other
people's homes? Why would we fund our retirements with the destruction
of other people's olive groves?" the Corries asked of shareholders. "
[Caterpillar shareholders] should know there are good and decent people
in Israel, in Palestine ... and [shareholders] should support them and
not support violence," they said in a statement.
Activists supporting the parents who lost their daughter in 2003
say that the company sells machinery to the Israeli army in violation
of its corporate accountability pledge, knowing full well that the
equipment will be used for the destruction of Palestinian homes and
farms.
"We are part of a growing movement for corporate responsibility in
the United States," said Matt Gaines of the STOP CAT campaign in a
telephone interview from outside the shareholders' meeting in Chicago.
"Getting the US government to take action on this issue has been very,
very difficult, even though we are still working on it. But we are
taking it directly to the corporations involved that are sponsoring,
aiding or abetting war crimes," he said.
Caterpillar has become the poster child for US companies that are
being targeted in divestment drives for their role in human rights
abuses by the Israeli army in occupied Palestinian lands. It is also
facing charges of war crimes in a lawsuit -- Corrie v Caterpillar Inc
-- filed by the parents of Rachel Corrie.
The company has said in the past that it bears no responsibility
for how its products are used by clients. Spokespersons from the
company were not immediately available for comment but the company has
recently responded to accusations of its complicity and cooperation in
Israel's razing of civilian homes by launching a multi-million dollar
public relations campaign to minimise brand risk.
Rachel Corrie was killed in the Gazan town of Rafah while she and
other members of the International Solidarity Movement were trying to
stop the demolition of a Palestinian home on 16 March 2003.
Caterpillar built the nine-tonne bulldozer that ran over Corrie, a
23-year-old college student from Olympia in Washington State. Her death
made international headlines and triggered widespread condemnation.
Israeli courts have yet to prosecute anyone for the incident.
The Illinois-based Caterpillar Inc, which had annual sales and
revenues -- more than half of which from overseas -- of $36.3 billion
last year, has been reluctant to disclose how much money it makes from
its dealings with Israel.
"Caterpillar profits from each home its bulldozers help Israel to
demolish, each centimetre of the annexation wall its bulldozers help
Israel to build, each olive tree its bulldozers help Israel to uproot,"
said Noura Erekat of the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation
outside the shareholders' meeting.
Peace activists estimate that since Israel occupied Arab land in
the 1967 War, Caterpillar bulldozers have illegally razed the homes of
more than 50,000 Palestinians. They say that in the past five years
alone, Caterpillar equipment was used to uproot over one million olive
trees owned by Palestinians. International human rights organisations
and bodies, such as the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Amnesty
International and Human Rights Watch, have repeatedly singled out
Caterpillar for its complicity in rights abuses in the occupied
Palestinian territories.
But it is the divestment campaign -- mostly led by Christian
institutional investors, including the Presbyterian Church USA, the
World Council of Churches, the Church of England and the Church of
Scotland -- that has most alarmed right-wing pro- Israel groups in the
US and the company. Jewish investors are taking part, including Jewish
Voice for Peace. Together, these groups represent some 500 million
people.
The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, a
right-wing Zionist organisation that says it monitors the US media for
biased reporting against Israel, has defended the Israeli army and said
that Corrie and other peace activists were hindering the army's work to
track down suspected terrorists and weapons smugglers. Peace activists
counter that as well as homes and roads, the Israeli army destroys
olive trees, farmland and even water wells -- hardly hideouts for
terrorist suspects.
They also point to a number of attempts to muzzle information and
awareness about Corrie's death. Recently, a play about Rachel Corrie's
life that had two successful runs in London was banned from the New
York Theatre Workshop after protests from some Jewish groups. Copies of
the play, composed of letters and journal entries, entitled "My Name is
Rachel Corrie", were taken off bookshelves and only a few are now
available in the United States, campaigners say.
Further, when Corrie's parents called on the State Department to investigate the killing, their plea was rebuffed.
Writing in the conservative Jerusalem Post, Elwood McQuaid,
a self-styled "Christian Zionist" who served as the executive director
of The Friends of Israel Ministry in the US, characterised the
corporate responsibility campaign against Caterpillar and the Israeli
army as part of a conspiracy. "What is at issue here has little to do
with moral justice; but it has much to do with radical, liberal,
leftist obsession," the pastor wrote.
Zionists groups have sprung to support Caterpillar. At the
meetings, Allyson Rowen Taylor, associate director of the American
Jewish Congress, said those worried about human rights abuses against
Palestinians should also call for an end to sales of company products
to countries like China and Egypt, where human rights abuses are
rampant.
Taylor's words have not dissuaded Christian groups from discussing
the issue further on Christian and moral grounds. An intense debate was
raging last week in Birmingham, Alabama, where thousands of delegates
to the Presbyterian General Assembly were taking decisions on future
steps in their divestment drive.
Christian Zionist groups have pressured the church by saying that
divestment was the wrong approach and called for more investments
instead to build neighbourly relations between Palestinians and the
Israelis.
But last week, the National Middle Eastern Presbyterian Caucus of
the Presbyterian Church said in a statement that while a positive
investment strategy can be constructive, it fails "to stop the Israeli
government from confiscating Palestinian property and expropriating
Palestinian land".
© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved
Al-Ahram Weekly Online :
Located at: http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2006/801/re52.htm